Anonymous public opinion poll — vote and see results by state.
How would you respond? All voting is anonymous by default.
Close appropriate loopholes so every company pays taxes: 100% (3 votes)
3 total votes
While the statutory federal corporate tax rate for C corporations is 21 percent, many large, profitable companies pay far less — and some pay nothing at all. According to a 2026 analysis by the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy, at least 88 of the largest U.S. corporations paid zero federal income tax in 2025, despite collectively earning over $105 billion in pretax profits. Companies such as Tesla, United Airlines, Walt Disney, and PayPal were among those that reported no federal tax liability. These companies use a combination of legal provisions — including accelerated depreciation, research and development tax credits, stock-option deductions, and offshore profit-shifting strategies — to reduce their taxable income to zero. The issue has drawn renewed attention as recent legislation, including the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act and the 2025 One Big Beautiful Bill Act, expanded or preserved many of these provisions. Meanwhile, Gallup polling from 2025 found that 70 percent of Americans believe corporations pay too little in federal income taxes, a view that has remained consistent for more than a decade.
Supporters of closing these provisions argue that allowing profitable corporations to pay nothing undermines tax fairness, shifts the burden onto individuals and small businesses, and deprives the government of needed revenue. The U.S. Treasury Department has noted that large corporations using these strategies often pay lower effective tax rates than middle-class workers, and that their tax-planning advantages give them an unfair edge over smaller competitors. On the other side, organizations like the Tax Foundation argue that many of these provisions — especially accelerated depreciation and R&D credits — are intentional policy tools designed to encourage business investment, innovation, and job creation. They contend that increasing the tax burden on corporations could discourage capital formation, reduce U.S. competitiveness globally, and slow economic growth. Some researchers at the National Bureau of Economic Research have found that tax incentives for capital investment can create employment, though the evidence on whether these benefits reach ordinary workers in the form of higher wages remains mixed.
The stakes of this debate are significant. Corporate income tax revenue has declined from nearly a third of all federal revenue in the 1950s to roughly 8.6 percent in 2025, according to ITEP and Treasury data, meaning a shrinking share of government operations is funded by corporate profits. If loopholes were closed, proponents say billions in annual revenue could fund public services or reduce deficits. If they are preserved, supporters argue the economy benefits from greater private investment. The outcome of this debate affects not just corporate bottom lines but the federal budget, the competitive landscape for small businesses, and ultimately how the cost of government is shared among all taxpayers.