OurUSAVoice
Government

Should the US government revoke passports of parents who owe more than $2,500 in unpaid child support?

Anonymous public opinion poll — vote and see results by state.

Should the US government revoke passports of parents who owe more than $2,500 in unpaid child suppor

How would you respond? All voting is anonymous by default.

Current Results

Yes, it's an effective way to enforce child support obligations: 100% (1 vote)

1 total vote

Background

Federal law has long authorized the government to deny or revoke passports from parents who owe more than $2,500 in unpaid child support. The legal authority traces back to the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Act signed by President Clinton in 1996, with the threshold later lowered from $5,000 to $2,500 by the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005. For most of the program's history, enforcement was limited mainly to blocking new applications and renewals. In May 2026, the State Department announced it would dramatically expand the program in coordination with the Department of Health and Human Services, beginning with about 2,700 passport holders who owe $100,000 or more and then extending to anyone above the $2,500 threshold. According to the Congressional Research Service, the passport denial program has collected nearly $621 million in child support arrears since its inception in 1998. The House has also passed H.R. 6903, a bill that would further codify passport revocation as a mandatory enforcement remedy.

Supporters of the policy argue it provides a meaningful consequence that motivates delinquent parents to fulfill their legal obligations to their children. The State Department has pointed to evidence that even the announcement of expanded enforcement prompted hundreds of parents to resolve their arrears with state authorities. Assistant Secretary of State for Consular Affairs Mora Namdar has called it an expansion of a commonsense practice proven effective at collecting unpaid support. Critics, however, raise concerns about fairness and proportionality. Data from California has shown that roughly 80 percent of parents who owe child support earn less than $20,000 a year, suggesting that some noncustodial parents may be unable rather than unwilling to pay. Census Bureau data also shows that child support debt falls unevenly across racial and socioeconomic lines, with incarcerated parents accruing an average of more than $20,000 in debt while unable to earn income. Some observers note that it remains unclear whether exemptions will be granted based on individual circumstances.

The stakes of this debate extend to millions of American families. Census data shows that about 5.4 million parents were owed child support as of 2017, receiving only 62 percent of the money due on average, while 30 percent of custodial parents received nothing at all. For children in those families, child support is often a critical financial lifeline. At the same time, the policy could affect many thousands of passport holders whose debts may reflect economic hardship rather than willful neglect. In 2023, $25.7 billion in child support was collected nationally, but a substantial gap remains between what is owed and what is received. How the government balances the goal of enforcing parental responsibility against concerns about punishing poverty will shape both the effectiveness of the program and its impact on some of the most economically vulnerable families in the country.

Vote Now on OurUSAVoice

More Questions